I really enjoyed this project as it was an interesting look at how ancient Egyptians likely solved mathematical problems. It demonstrates that there are different methods to solve a single problem, and limited by techniques developed at the time, we can see that it is still possible to solve this problem using the same method they solved in the past. I can see this activity be incorporated in a classroom learning about surface area and volume, which can teach students to think creatively “outside the box” when determining frustum volumes by separating the frustum into different three-dimensional shapes.
I am a very visual
learner. I like to visualize how we can “cut” shapes into other familiar
shapes. Visualizing the frustum as a pyramid with a “smaller top pyramid” cut
off allows me to easily understand the shape of a frustum. Alternatively, I
learned another way to construct a frustrum through adding a cube, four smaller
corner pyramids, and four triangular prisms. This example alone demonstrates
that there are multiple ways to visualize the same shape. For the non-visual and
pure math learners, this exercise of calculating the volume of a frustum through
similar triangles was another approach that demonstrates different methods
arriving at the same solution. Ultimately, it demonstrates how there is no definitive
method to solving mathematical problems. As an educator, it is my job to
present several possible ways to solve problems to students, and allow them
freedom and flexibility to choose which method works for them!
Wonderful! Great, teacherly ideas arising from this project -- great work.
ReplyDelete